Which of the following is true regarding a buyer's obligations to inspect goods?

The obligation for a buyer to inspect goods before acceptance is grounded in the principle of reasonable standards as outlined in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which governs transactions involving the sale of goods. This principle is designed to ensure that the buyer has the opportunity to verify that the goods conform to the terms of the contract. By inspecting the goods, the buyer can identify any defects, discrepancies, or nonconformities that may exist, which ultimately safeguards the buyer's rights and interests.

The requirement for inspection is not just a formality; it holds significance in the context of acceptance and the potential for rejection of nonconforming goods. If the buyer fails to inspect the goods and subsequently accepts them without any due diligence, they may lose the right to claim that the goods are defective.

In contrast, the other options do not reflect the obligations imposed on a buyer. A buyer is indeed obligated to inspect the goods, and they cannot simply reject the responsibility for inspection or assume that they can accept goods without first evaluating them. This inspection process is a critical part of managing risks in commercial transactions.